www.unuudur.com: The latest news of Mongolia in the World

Fitch Ratings has downgraded Mongolia’s Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) to ‘B-’ from ‘B’. The Outlooks are Stable. The issue ratings on Mongolia’s senior unsecured foreign-currency bonds have also been downgraded to ‘B-’ from ‘B’. The Country Ceiling has been downgraded to ‘B-’ from ‘B’ and the Short-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs have been affirmed at ‘B’. KEY RATING DRIVERS The downgrade of Mongolia’s Long-Term IDRs reflects the following key rating drivers: Mongolia’s fiscal indicators have deteriorated significantly and external liquidity risks have increased. Large pre-election spending programmes and weaker economic growth contributed to a dramatic widening of the general government deficit to 19.7% of GDP in 2016, the highest among Fitch-rated sovereigns based on our adjusted measure that includes commercial spending by the Development Bank of Mongolia (DBM). Fitch expects greater borrowing and the sharp depreciation of the tugrik over the past year to push gross general government debt to 84.3% of GDP at end-2016, compared to the ‘B’ category median of 51.2%. Mongolia has repeatedly missed targets set under its Fiscal Stability Law, evidence of a poor track record of policy implementation. External financing conditions and market access have tightened ahead of looming repayments on sovereign and sovereign-guaranteed debt. Mongolia’s external liquidity will be tested by over USD2bn in sovereign external debt payments scheduled over 2017 and 2018. This includes the maturity of an USD580m sovereign-guaranteed bond issued by the DBM on 21 March 2017, and another USD500m sovereign bond due on 5 January 2018. Liquidity buffers have diminished over the year, despite the government raising USD750m through a syndicated loan and bond issuance in March and April respectively. Headline international reserves stood at USD1.1bn at end-September 2016, the lowest level since 2009. Fitch estimates a further USD0.6bn is still available to be drawn through the CNY15bn (USD2.2bn) swap agreement with the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). Mongolia’s IDRs also reflect the following key rating drivers: Weak public and external finances relative to ‘B’ category peers and a heavy dependence on commodities and China weigh on Mongolia’s ratings, but these are balanced by the potential of a transformative improvement to the credit profile in the medium term as further projects to harness the country’s vast natural resources make progress. Mongolia also scores well on political stability and lack of violence in the World Bank’s governance indicators compared with other sovereigns in the ‘B’ category. Fitch expects the termination of pre-election spending programmes and other one-off spending to help bring the deficit down to 11.5% of GDP in 2017. The agency’s forecasts show a slower pace of fiscal consolidation than that envisioned by the authorities, reflecting weaker nominal growth expectations and a history of fiscal slippages. However the 65 out of 76 seat majority won by the Mongolian People’s Party in the June 2016 election could create a political environment that is more stable and conducive for effective policy-making than under the previous “super coalition” government. Fitch’s expects that near-term refinancing pressures will be alleviated through some combination of multilateral and bilateral support, giving the new government time and space to implement macroeconomic policy reforms and stabilise economic conditions. The authorities have requested financial assistance from the IMF to help manage balance of payment pressures, and plan to finalise a programme by early next year prior to the repayment of the DBM bond. An IMF programme alone is unlikely to be sufficient to cover Mongolia’s refinancing needs, but is expected to be accompanied by funding from other multilateral institutions, such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. The authorities are also in discussion with the PBOC to extend and expand the swap agreement, which is due to expire in August 2017. Medium-term external debt sustainability depends on whether the new government can encourage foreign investment and expedite large-scale mining and infrastructure projects, as laid out in the Economic Stabilization Plan. Foreign direct investment inflows linked to the second phase of the Oyu Tolgoi project will bring approximately USD6bn into the country over six years, although Fitch expects 30%-40% will be used to import capital goods. A possible resumption of the development of Tavan Tolgoi coal mines and the development of associated transport and infrastructure projects could strengthen Mongolia’s external accounts considerably. The surge in coal prices since May could add further incentive for stakeholders to strike agreements. Mongolia’s public debt dynamics are sensitive to exchange rate movements, with external loans and securities comprising 70% of the government debt stock. Monetary financing of pre-election policy loan programmes and the subsidised Housing Mortgage Program (HMP) sharply increased the money supply, weighing on the tugrik. Central bank lending to the general government has increased by MNT566bn (USD232m) year-to-date as of October 2016. The Bank of Mongolia increased policy rates by 450bp to 15% in August and introduced three-month Central Bank Bills to manage excess tugrik liquidity, and stave off deposit dollarisation. The pre-election policy loan programmes have since been terminated, and the Bank of Mongolia has committed to restrict new lending in the HMP only to what can be funded through repayments of existing loans. However any unplanned new fiscal activities financed through the central bank could contribute to further depreciation of the currency. The use of Central Bank Bills to absorb liquidity, along with foreign-exchange losses on swap transactions, has contributed to a MNT1.2trn capital loss for the Bank of Mongolia between January and September 2016. While there is no requirement to resolve the Bank of Mongolia’s negative capital position in the short term, it could ultimately affect the general government balance sheet through foregone dividends or eventual recapitalisation. Fitch expects GDP growth of 0.5% in 2016 and 1.8% in 2017, substantially lower than the 10.4% average growth experienced between 2010 and 2015. Tight fiscal and monetary conditions are likely to weigh on growth over the next two years, though these would be balanced against higher investment and employment tied to the development of the second phase of Oyu Tolgoi. Growth in 2017 has the potential to swing considerably either side of our forecast, depending on the success of the Economic Stabilization Plan and external financing conditions. Low growth, a pick-up in the unemployment rate and the sharp tugrik depreciation have lifted the commercial bank non-performing loan ratio to 9.1% at end-October 2016, from 7.5% in December 2015. Fitch expects asset-quality pressures to continue. SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO) Fitch’s proprietary SRM assigns Mongolia a score equivalent to a rating of ‘B-’ on the Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR scale. Fitch’s sovereign rating committee adjusted the output from the SRM to arrive at the final Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows: – Macro: +1 notch, to reflect Mongolia’s high medium-term growth prospects due to development of the second phase of Oyu Tolgoi. – External Finances: -1 notch, to reflect weaknesses in Mongolia’s external finances not captured in the SRM, including the very high net external debt burden and large external financing needs relative to reserves. Fitch’s SRM is the agency’s proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three year centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR. Fitch’s QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM. RATING SENSITIVITIES The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch’s assessment that upside and downside risks to the rating are currently balanced. The main factors that could lead to positive action, individually or collectively, are: – Implementation of credible and coherent macroeconomic policy-making that improves Mongolia’s basic economic stability. – A track record of meeting stated fiscal targets, contributing to an improved outlook for government debt ratios. – Evidence of substantial improvement in the country’s medium-term external liquidity, for example through a build-up of reserve buffers, strong inflows of FDI or significant narrowing of the current-account deficit. The main factors that could lead to negative action, individually, or collectively, are: – Difficulty meeting imminent external financing needs, for example if multilateral and bilateral support is not forthcoming. – A material increase in government debt ratios above Fitch’s expectations, for example through a failure to meet fiscal targets and/or a sharp depreciation of the currency. – Emergence of systemic financial stress KEY ASSUMPTIONS – Mongolia maintains stable political and economic relations with China, its largest export destination and key provider of its international liquidity resources. Contact: Primary Analyst Mervyn Tang Director +852 2263 9944 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F, Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong Secondary Analyst Thomas Rookmaaker Director +852 2263 9891 Committee Chairperson Jan Friederich Senior Director +852 2263 9910 Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Country Ceilings (pub. 16 Aug 2016) here Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1015169 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001